Thursday, December 29, 2005

Canadian Crime Count

Darcy at Dust My Broom says Canadian violent crime exceeds U.S. and points to Canada Blames Us as his source. Canadians enjoy blaming their violent crime on "American" guns. But . . .
There is another more serious difficulty: You don't have to live next to the United States to see how hard it is to stop criminals from getting guns. The easy part is getting law-abiding citizens to disarm; the hard part is getting the guns from criminals. Drug gangs that are firing guns in places like Toronto seem to have little trouble getting the drugs that they sell and it should not be surprising that they can get the weapons they need as well.

The experiences in the U.K. and Australia, two island nations whose borders are much easier to monitor, should also give Canadian gun controllers some pause. The British government banned handguns in 1997 but recently reported that gun crime in England and Wales nearly doubled in the four years from 1998-99 to 2002-03.

. . . . .

The 2000 International Crime Victimization Survey, the last survey completed, shows the violent-crime rate in England and Wales was twice the rate of that in the U.S. When the new survey for 2004 comes out later this year, that gap will undoubtedly have widened even further as crimes reported to British police have since soared by 35 percent, while those in the U.S. have declined 6 percent.

. . . . .

Many things affect crime: The rise of drug-gang violence in Canada and Britain is an important part of the story, just as it has long been important in explaining the U.S.'s rates. (Few Canadians appreciate that 70 percent of American murders take place in just 3.5 percent of our counties, and that a large percentage of those are drug-gang related.) Just as these gangs can smuggle drugs into the country, they can smuggle in weapons to defend their turf. . . . .
Some of the commenters on Darcy's post argue that if the statistics are adjusted to reflect the differing definitions of crime and standards of reporting, then Canada still has a lower crime rate than America. Their arguments make a convincing prima facie case. Their arguments also miss the significance of the growth in their crime rate. The directions of these vectors are more important than their starting points.